Thread:OFSRazgriz/@comment-43981946-20200904123345/@comment-43981946-20200905121919

well my logic on the ingame decr. thing is that the lorebits are already given in the game, so no-one coming to the wiki would be coming for that. Technically this applies to the stat tables as well though, which is why i didnt outright condemn it.

There is very little actual hard info besides stats that could go on the pages; if we limited ourselves to objective descriptions everything would read like "This plane's good at AA. Can't equip bombs. Bad dogfighter", which is usually obvious in-game. Even before i got here, the more fleshed-out articles tried to be nuanced, so i said "ok, let's roll with this then".

As for... everything else, however, i guess we will just have to agree to disagree. There has indeed been a bit of a clique forming (if you can call 2 and a half users a clique), but it would not hurt to at least try and meet em halfway. I am aware that some ...friction was generated a few days ago regarding AC trivia bits; that's a sore spot that extends somewhat beyond the wiki.

It all comes down to preference in the end. Insults wont change that (or change writing styles, for that matter).